Murphy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Murphy v. State

892 S.W.2d 757, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1981, 1994 WL 714559

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Murphy v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1657 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 27, 1994·No. No. 65206·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, after an eviden-tiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, after an eviden-tiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Murphy v. State, 892 S.W.2d 757, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1981, 1994 WL 714559 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

892 S.W.2d 757 (Murphy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.