Murphy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Murphy v. State

928 S.W.2d 15, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1506, 1996 WL 495079

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Murphy v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1657 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 3, 1996·No. No. 70108·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Murphy appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Murphy appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Murphy v. State, 928 S.W.2d 15, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1506, 1996 WL 495079 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

928 S.W.2d 15 (Murphy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.