Murphy v. Donovan

352 N.E.2d 210, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 519, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 764
Massachusetts Appeals Court·Decided August 11, 1976·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

Keville, J.

In 1951 Peter and Mary Dalton recorded the subdivision plan of a tract of land in Chatham which is reproduced on the following page as figure l. 1 In 1954

*520 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

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Donovan, 352 N.E.2d 210, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 519, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 764 (Mass. Ct. App. 1976).

352 N.E.2d 210 (Murphy v. Donovan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kitras v. Town of Aquinnah
22 N.E.3d 981 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2015)
Apfel v. Miller
10 N.E.3d 1139 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2014)
Kuczinski v. Gliniecki
29 Mass. L. Rptr. 408 (Massachusetts Superior Court, 2011)
Matthews v. Planning Board
892 N.E.2d 797 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2008)
MacIntyre v. Baltic Realty Corp.
18 Mass. L. Rptr. 680 (Massachusetts Superior Court, 2005)
Sheftel v. Lebel
689 N.E.2d 500 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1998)
Cohen v. Planning Board
1 Mass. L. Rptr. 625 (Massachusetts Superior Court, 1994)
Boudreau v. Coleman
564 N.E.2d 1 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1990)
Patel v. Planning Board of North Andover
539 N.E.2d 544 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1989)
Melrose Housing Authority v. New Hampshire Insurance
520 N.E.2d 493 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1988)
Patelle v. Planning Board of Woburn
480 N.E.2d 35 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1985)
Brooks v. Capitol Truck Leasing, Inc.
434 N.E.2d 661 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1982)
Canton Highlands, Inc. v. Searle
398 N.E.2d 759 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1980)