Hathaway v. Hathaway
325 N.E.2d 299, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 727
Opinion
We refuse to consider the contestant’s appeal because his brief of two and one half pages is as devoid of argument concerning anything found in a 128 page transcript as was the brief described in J. L. Vaughan Heating & Engr. Co. Inc. v. Cantor, ante, 709 (1975). The brief is struck from the files. The decree allowing the will is affirmed, with double costs to the estate from January 16,1974.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hathaway v. Hathaway, 325 N.E.2d 299, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 727 (Mass. Ct. App. 1975).
325 N.E.2d 299 (Hathaway v. Hathaway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clapp v. Haynes
11 Mass. App. Ct. 895 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1980)
Murphy v. Donovan
352 N.E.2d 210 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1976)
Rozene v. Sverid
351 N.E.2d 541 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1976)