Murphy v. Comley Lumber Co.

1920 OK 379, 193 P. 997, 80 Okla. 66, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 152
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedDecember 14, 1920
Docket11315
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1920 OK 379 (Murphy v. Comley Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. Comley Lumber Co., 1920 OK 379, 193 P. 997, 80 Okla. 66, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 152 (Okla. 1920).

Opinion

RAINEY, C. J.

The motion to dismiss, to which there has been no response, is on the ground that the appeal has been filed out of time, and that therefore the court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

The record shows that judgment was entered on May 31, 1919. The record of the trial court, as corrected, shows that motion for new trial was overruled on June 5, 1919. No error is assigned thereon.

Petition in error, with transcript attached, was filed in this court April 3, 1920. The appeal being by transcript, which brings up only the record proper, and motions, the rulings thereon, and the exceptions thereto being no part of the record proper, the judgment entry of May 31, 1919, is the last proceeding in this case which can be considered as a part of the transcript. Williams v. Kelly, 71 Oklahoma, 176 Pac. 204; Folsom v. Billy, 78 Okla. 146, 189 Pac. 188; Morrison v. W. L. Green Comm. Co., 61 Okla. 287, 161 Pac. 218.

The appeal was filed in this court more than six months from the rendition of judg *67 ment. Under chapter 18, Sess. Laws 1910-11, proceedings in error in the district court must bo brought within six months from the date of the rendition of the judgment or order from which the appeal is sought to be taken, and, when not so brought, this court is without jurisdiction to review such final order. Perry v. Werline, 77 Okla. 92, and cases therein cited; Wood v. McEwen, 45 Okla. 11, 144 Pac. 590.

Eor the reasons stated, the appeal is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Cutchall
1928 OK 422 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)
Morrison v. Massey
1922 OK 353 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1920 OK 379, 193 P. 997, 80 Okla. 66, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-comley-lumber-co-okla-1920.