Morrison v. Massey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Morrison v. Massey

1922 OK 353, 211 P. 1038, 88 Okla. 143, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 342

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 12, 1922

Docket13871

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 1922 OK 353 (Morrison v. Massey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morrison v. Massey, 1922 OK 353, 211 P. 1038, 88 Okla. 143, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 342 (Okla. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

KANE, J.

This cause comes on to be heard upon the motion of defendant in error to dismiss appeal, because not filed in this court- within six months from date of final order.

Judgment was rendered on the 28th day of March, 1922, and motion for new trial overruled on the 18th day of April, 1922, and record filed in this court on the 18th day of October, 1922. No ease-made was ever settled and signed by the trial judge, and the ease is here on transcript, and this being true, the order overruling motion for new trial cannot be considered, and the lime for filing appeal in this court began to run on March 28, 1922, the day that judgment was rendered, and expired on the 28th day of September 1922, 20 days before the appeal was filed. Murphy v. Comley Lumber Co., 80 Okla. 66, 193 Pac. 997.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KANE, J.

This cause comes on to be heard upon the motion of defendant in error to dismiss appeal, because not filed in this court- within six months from date of final order.

Judgment was rendered on the 28th day of March, 1922, and motion for new trial overruled on the 18th day of April, 1922, and record filed in this court on the 18th day of October, 1922. No ease-made was ever settled and signed by the trial judge, and the ease is here on transcript, and this being true, the order overruling motion for new trial cannot be considered, and the lime for filing appeal in this court began to run on March 28, 1922, the day that judgment was rendered, and expired on the 28th day of September 1922, 20 days before the appeal was filed. Murphy v. Comley Lumber Co., 80 Okla. 66, 193 Pac. 997.

The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1922 OK 353, 211 P. 1038, 88 Okla. 143, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morrison-v-massey-okla-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack