Morrison v. Massey

1922 OK 353, 211 P. 1038, 88 Okla. 143, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 342
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided December 12, 1922·No. 13871·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

KANE, J.

This cause comes on to be heard upon the motion of defendant in error to dismiss appeal, because not filed in this court- within six months from date of final order.

Judgment was rendered on the 28th day of March, 1922, and motion for new trial overruled on the 18th day of April, 1922, and record filed in this court on the 18th day of October, 1922. No ease-made was ever settled and signed by the trial judge, and the ease is here on transcript, and this being true, the order overruling motion for new trial cannot be considered, and the lime for filing appeal in this court began to run on March 28, 1922, the day that judgment was rendered, and expired on the 28th day of September 1922, 20 days before the appeal was filed. Murphy v. Comley Lumber Co., 80 Okla. 66, 193 Pac. 997.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morrison v. Massey, 1922 OK 353, 211 P. 1038, 88 Okla. 143, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 342 (Okla. 1922).

1922 OK 353 (Morrison v. Massey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pepis v. Red Bank Oil Co.
1935 OK 11 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Peters v. Wallace
1927 OK 279 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1927)
Barnes v. Morris
1924 OK 973 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Nolan v. Clift
1924 OK 151 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)