Wood v. McEwen

1914 OK 599, 144 P. 590, 45 Okla. 11, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 229
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided November 24, 1914·No. 5651·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

RIDDLE, J.

Judgment denying ipotion to reinstate this cause was rendered in the trial court on March 31, 1914. The proceedings in error were filed in this court on October 4, 1914. Motion to dismiss has been filed, upon the -ground that the pro *12 ceedings were not commenced in this court within the time required by chapter 18, Sess. Laws 1910-11, requiring that proceedings in error must be commenced in this court within six months from the date of rendition of the judgment complained of. It appears that more than six months have elapsed since the rendition of the order by the trial court complained of, and therefore this court has no jurisdiction to hear and determine the case on its merits.

The motion to dismiss is therefore sustained, and the appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wood v. McEwen, 1914 OK 599, 144 P. 590, 45 Okla. 11, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 229 (Okla. 1914).

1914 OK 599 (Wood v. McEwen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Estate of Cutchall
1928 OK 422 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)
Murphy v. Comley Lumber Co.
1920 OK 379 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)