Munson S. S. Lines v. Newman

Fifth Circuit

Munson S. S. Lines v. Newman

24 F.2d 416, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2072, 1928 A.M.C. 585

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 25, 1928

DocketNo. 5129

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 24 F.2d 416 (Munson S. S. Lines v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Munson S. S. Lines v. Newman, 24 F.2d 416, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2072, 1928 A.M.C. 585 (5th Cir. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree in admiralty awarding [417]*417damages for a personal injury sustained by appellee while he was employed as longshoreman and engaged in unloading cargo. A piece of plank used as dunnage was unsound, and broke under appellee’s weight, causing him to lose his balance, with the result that a box of freight which he was lifting fell on him and injured him.

The negligence charged in the libel was the failure to use reasonable care to provide a safe place for the stevedore and his longshoremen to work. It is insisted on this appeal that the failure to use sound boards for dunnage was the fault of the stevedore who loaded the ship, and that the owners are not chargeable with negligence. It is the duty of the ship initially to exercise due diligence to furnish the stevedore with a safe place to work, and she cannot escape liability by showing that a competent stevedore was employed at the loading port when the accident oeeurs in unloading.

Objection was made to the deposition taken at Miami for use in the trial at Jacksonville. The deposition was taken under section 865 of the Revised Statutes (28 USCA § 641), on the ground that the witness was at a greater distance than 100 miles from the place where the court was sitting. There is nothing in the objection, as this court .will take judicial notice that the distance between the cities named is more than 100 miles.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree in admiralty awarding [417]*417damages for a personal injury sustained by appellee while he was employed as longshoreman and engaged in unloading cargo. A piece of plank used as dunnage was unsound, and broke under appellee’s weight, causing him to lose his balance, with the result that a box of freight which he was lifting fell on him and injured him.

The negligence charged in the libel was the failure to use reasonable care to provide a safe place for the stevedore and his longshoremen to work. It is insisted on this appeal that the failure to use sound boards for dunnage was the fault of the stevedore who loaded the ship, and that the owners are not chargeable with negligence. It is the duty of the ship initially to exercise due diligence to furnish the stevedore with a safe place to work, and she cannot escape liability by showing that a competent stevedore was employed at the loading port when the accident oeeurs in unloading.

Objection was made to the deposition taken at Miami for use in the trial at Jacksonville. The deposition was taken under section 865 of the Revised Statutes (28 USCA § 641), on the ground that the witness was at a greater distance than 100 miles from the place where the court was sitting. There is nothing in the objection, as this court .will take judicial notice that the distance between the cities named is more than 100 miles.

The decree is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 F.2d 416, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2072, 1928 A.M.C. 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/munson-s-s-lines-v-newman-ca5-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack