Munoz v. 13 Custom Cabinets LLC
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9 Enrique Munoz, No. CV-24-00307-TUC-JR
10 Plaintiff, ORDER
11 v.
12 13 Custom Cabinets LLC, et al.,
13 Defendants. 14 15 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (Doc. 13). 16 17 Pursuant to General Order 21-25 and because of incomplete status of election, Magistrate 18 Judge Jacqueline Rateau issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Doc. 14) on 19 Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment. No objections to Magistrate Judge 20 21 Rateau’s R & R have been filed and the time for filing an objection has elapsed. 22 This Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 23 recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). “Within fourteen days 24 after being served with a copy [of a report and recommendation], any party may serve and 25 26 file written objections . . . . [T]he court shall make a de novo determination of those portions 27 of the [report and recommendation] to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 28 Section 636(b)(1), Title 28 U.S.C., does not “require[ ] some lesser review by the district 1) court when no objections are filed.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985). Instead, 2 district courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the 3 4 subject of an objection.” Jd. at 149. 5 This Court has reviewed the R & R and finds that it is well-reasoned. The Court 6 adopts the R & R’s factual findings and legal conclusions. For the reasons set forth in the 7 g R & R, the Court finds that default judgment should issue. Accordingly, 9 IT IS ORDERED ADOPTING Magistrate Judge Rateau’s Report and 10/1 Recommendation (Doc. 14) and GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default 11 Judgment (Doc. 13). 12 13 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor 14] of Plaintiff and against Defendants 13 Custom Cabinets, LLC, Frank Amavizca and Maria 15 Amavizca jointly and severally in the amount of $6,888.50 and against Defendant 13 16 17 Custom Cabinets, LLC in the additional amount of $1,111.50. 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of the Court shall close this case. 19 Dated this 31st day of January, 2025. 20 21 22 23 Dp □ TT Honorable Raner C. Collins 25 Senior United States District Judge 26 27 28
_2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Munoz v. 13 Custom Cabinets LLC (Munoz v. 13 Custom Cabinets LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.