Mufid Al-Din, Also Known as Charles A. Parker v. Michael Bowersox
This text of 176 F.3d 1043 (Mufid Al-Din, Also Known as Charles A. Parker v. Michael Bowersox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Respondent Michael Bowersox appeals from an order entered in the United States District Court2 for the Western District of Missouri denying his motion to dismiss Mufid A-Din’s petition for writ of habeas corpus as untimely filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Parker v. Bowersox, 975 F.Supp. 1251 (W.D.Mo.1997) (order denying respondent’s motion to dismiss and granting respondent’s motion for an interlocutory appeal). Jurisdiction in the district court was based upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 2254. Jurisdiction in this court is based upon 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). In an earlier proceeding, a divided panel of this court affirmed. We subsequently vacated the panel opinion and granted respondent’s suggestion for rehearing en banc. Now, in accordance with our en banc opinion filed on this date in the consolidated cases under the title Nichols v. Bowersox, 172 F.3d 1068 (8th Cir.1999) (en banc), we affirm the order of the district court denying respondent’s motion to dismiss. See 8th Cir.R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 F.3d 1043, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 7280, 1999 WL 203817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mufid-al-din-also-known-as-charles-a-parker-v-michael-bowersox-ca8-1999.