Mosley v. Oroski

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 31, 2011·No. 08-15327·Unpublished

Opinion

FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 31 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

RON MOSLEY, No. 08-15327

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-05-04260-TEH Northern District of California, v. San Francisco

S. OROSKI, ORDER Respondent - Appellee.

RON MOSLEY, No. 08-15389

Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-05-04260-TEH Northern District of California, v. San Francisco

S. OROSKI,

Respondent - Appellee.

Before: ALARCÓN and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Swarthout v. Cooke, No. 10-333,

2011 WL 197627 (Jan. 24, 2011) (per curiam), the disposition filed on November

24, 2010 is withdrawn. Further proceedings are stayed pending final resolution of

Cooke v. Solis, 606 F.3d 1206 (9th Cir. 2010), and Clay v. Kane, 384 Fed. App’x 544 (9th Cir. 2010), in this court. The parties are requested to file a notice

memorandum with the Clerk of this court as soon as decisions have been rendered

in these cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mosley v. Oroski, (9th Cir. 2011).

Mosley v. Oroski (Mosley v. Oroski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooke v. Solis
606 F.3d 1206 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)