Mosley v. Oroski
This text of Mosley v. Oroski (Mosley v. Oroski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 31 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
RON MOSLEY, No. 08-15327
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-05-04260-TEH Northern District of California, v. San Francisco
S. OROSKI, ORDER Respondent - Appellee.
RON MOSLEY, No. 08-15389
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-05-04260-TEH Northern District of California, v. San Francisco
S. OROSKI,
Respondent - Appellee.
Before: ALARCÓN and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Swarthout v. Cooke, No. 10-333,
2011 WL 197627 (Jan. 24, 2011) (per curiam), the disposition filed on November
24, 2010 is withdrawn. Further proceedings are stayed pending final resolution of
Cooke v. Solis, 606 F.3d 1206 (9th Cir. 2010), and Clay v. Kane, 384 Fed. App’x 544 (9th Cir. 2010), in this court. The parties are requested to file a notice
memorandum with the Clerk of this court as soon as decisions have been rendered
in these cases.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mosley v. Oroski, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mosley-v-oroski-ca9-2011.