Morton v. West

13 Vet. App. 205, 1999 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 757, 1999 WL 549294
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided July 28, 1999·No. No. 96-1517·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On July 14, 1999, in a panel opinion, the Court affirmed the Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision that determined that the appellant’s claims for service connection for hearing loss: varicose veins; a back disorder other than scoliosis of the thora-columbar vertebras; and shortening or lengthening of the right upper extremity were not well grounded. Morton v. West, 12 Vet.App. 477 (1999). Pursuant to the Court’s Internal Operating Procedures (IOP) at V.(a)(3), a judge requested en banc consideration.

On consideration of the foregoing, and it appearing that a decision of the full Court is not necessary either to ensure uniformity of decision or to resolve a question of exceptional importance (see IOP at V.(b)), it is

ORDERED that en banc consideration is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morton v. West, 13 Vet. App. 205, 1999 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 757, 1999 WL 549294 (Cal. 1999).

13 Vet. App. 205 (Morton v. West) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberson v. Principi
17 Vet. App. 135 (Veterans Claims, 2003)
Stanley v. Principi
16 Vet. App. 356 (Veterans Claims, 2002)
Carpenter v. Principi
15 Vet. App. 64 (Veterans Claims, 2001)
Holliday v. Principi
14 Vet. App. 280 (Veterans Claims, 2001)
Morton v. Gober
14 Vet. App. 174 (Veterans Claims, 2000)
Timberlake v. Gober
14 Vet. App. 122 (Veterans Claims, 2000)
McCormick v. Gober
14 Vet. App. 39 (Veterans Claims, 2000)
Maddalino v. West
13 Vet. App. 475 (Veterans Claims, 2000)
Dyment v. West
13 Vet. App. 141 (Veterans Claims, 1999)