Morshed Alam v. Merrick Garland

Ninth Circuit

Morshed Alam v. Merrick Garland

997 F.3d 1260

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 3, 2021

Docket19-72744

StatusPublished

This text of 997 F.3d 1260 (Morshed Alam v. Merrick Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morshed Alam v. Merrick Garland, 997 F.3d 1260 (9th Cir. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 3 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MORSHED ALAM, No. 19-72744

Petitioner, Agency No. A215-826-397

v. ORDER MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI