Morris v. Manor

1999 OK CIV APP 59, 984 P.2d 254, 70 O.B.A.J. 1971, 1999 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 53, 1999 WL 398213
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 19, 1999
DocketNo. 92,107
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1999 OK CIV APP 59 (Morris v. Manor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. Manor, 1999 OK CIV APP 59, 984 P.2d 254, 70 O.B.A.J. 1971, 1999 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 53, 1999 WL 398213 (Okla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

Opinion by

KENNETH L. BUETTNER, Presiding Judge:

¶ 1 In its order of June 1, 1998, the Workers’ Compensation Court awarded Donna L. Morris a period of temporary total disability and 9% permanent partial disability to the right knee. It also ordered that Mitchell Manor, employer, was entitled to credit for overpayment of temporary total disability, to be deducted from the latter end of the award. Finally, it awarded Morris an attorney fee of $448.51, to be deducted in lump sum from the award. This order was not appealed. Mitchell Manor later moved to have the order certified to District Court because it had not been reimbursed the amount it had overpaid in TTD benefits. The court granted the motion after hearing arguments September 21, 1998. The Workers’ Compensation Court, as a court of limited jurisdiction, lacked authority to enter the order. Consequently, we vacate it.

¶ 2 The rule is that “.. .jurisdictional inquiries into a trial tribunal’s cognizance may be re-examined sua sponte, on appellate or certiorari review.” Red Rock Mental Health v. Roberts, 1996 OK 117, 940 P.2d 486, 491. Also, it “is well settled that the [Workers’ Compensation] Court is a statutory tribunal of limited jurisdiction and has only such jurisdiction as is conferred by law.” Hefley v. Neely Insurance Agency, Inc., 1998 OK 12, ¶ 7, 954 P.2d 135, 137.

¶ 3 With these principles in mind, we conclude that the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction because the Workers’ Compensation Act provides only one remedy for overpay-ments of temporary benefits overpaid by an employer: “a credit against any subsequent order for permanent disability.”1 The statute does not contemplate any other method, for example a money judgment in favor of employer, for recouping an overpayment of TTD except as a credit against a future [255]*255permanent disability award.2 For this reason, we vacate the order.

VACATED.

GARRETT, J., and JOPLIN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mangum Oil & Gas v. Mayabb
2016 OK CIV APP 48 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2015)
Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. Dean
2001 OK CIV APP 30 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1999 OK CIV APP 59, 984 P.2d 254, 70 O.B.A.J. 1971, 1999 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 53, 1999 WL 398213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-manor-oklacivapp-1999.