Morris Mac Schwebel v. Andrew D. Orrick, Harold C. Patterson, Earl F. Hastings, James C. Sargent
This text of 251 F.2d 919 (Morris Mac Schwebel v. Andrew D. Orrick, Harold C. Patterson, Earl F. Hastings, James C. Sargent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant asked the District Court to enjoin the Securities and Exchange Commission from conducting a hearing to determine whether appellant should be prevented from continuing to practice before the Commission. Though we think the District Court was right in dismissing the complaint, we think the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedy and the court therefore erred in ruling on the Commission’s authority to disbar attorneys. Camp v. Herzog, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 190 F.2d 605.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
251 F.2d 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-mac-schwebel-v-andrew-d-orrick-harold-c-patterson-earl-f-cadc-1958.