Morris Mac Schwebel v. Andrew D. Orrick, Harold C. Patterson, Earl F. Hastings, James C. Sargent

D.C. Circuit

Morris Mac Schwebel v. Andrew D. Orrick, Harold C. Patterson, Earl F. Hastings, James C. Sargent

251 F.2d 919

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided April 7, 1958·No. 14103·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant asked the District Court to enjoin the Securities and Exchange Commission from conducting a hearing to determine whether appellant should be prevented from continuing to practice before the Commission. Though we think the District Court was right in dismissing the complaint, we think the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedy and the court therefore erred in ruling on the Commission’s authority to disbar attorneys. Camp v. Herzog, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 190 F.2d 605.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant asked the District Court to enjoin the Securities and Exchange Commission from conducting a hearing to determine whether appellant should be prevented from continuing to practice before the Commission. Though we think the District Court was right in dismissing the complaint, we think the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedy and the court therefore erred in ruling on the Commission’s authority to disbar attorneys. Camp v. Herzog, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 190 F.2d 605.

Affirmed.

Morris Mac Schwebel v. Andrew D. Orrick, Harold C. Patterson, Earl F. Hastings, James C. Sargent, 251 F.2d 919 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

Pincite

251 F.2d 919 (Morris Mac Schwebel v. Andrew D. Orrick, Harold C. Patterson, Earl F. Hastings, James C. Sargent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related