Morris Electronics of Syracuse, Inc. v. Stereo East Developments, Inc.

71 A.D.2d 1061, 420 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13453
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 28, 1979
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 71 A.D.2d 1061 (Morris Electronics of Syracuse, Inc. v. Stereo East Developments, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris Electronics of Syracuse, Inc. v. Stereo East Developments, Inc., 71 A.D.2d 1061, 420 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13453 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

—Order [1062]*1062unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In this action for money owed on account and upon alleged personal guarantees, Special Term denied defendants’ motion for a discretionary change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (subd 3) and granted plaintiffs motion for a preference pursuant to CPLR 3403 (subd [a], par 3). Defendants did not submit an affidavit containing witnesses’ names, addresses and occupations, a full and fair statement of their expected testimony and the basis of such expectations. Special Term did not abuse its discretion in denying their motion for change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (Hurlbut v Whalen, 58 AD2d 311). Special Term abused its discretion in granting plaintiffs motion for a preference upon plaintiffs assertion that although it had not sought attachment it feared that the individual defendants would secrete assets in order to render worthless a possible judgment. A CPLR 3403 (subd [a], par 3) preference should only be granted where the circumstances are sufficiently unusual and extreme to justify the extraordinary privilege (see Dodumoff v Lyons, 4 AD2d 626; 4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 3403.10). (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court—change venue.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Schnepp, Doerr, Witmer and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gonzalez v. City of New York
18 Misc. 3d 968 (New York Supreme Court, 2008)
O'Brien v. Vassar Bros. Hospital
207 A.D.2d 169 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Green v. Vogel
144 A.D.2d 66 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Rago v. Nationwide Insurance
120 A.D.2d 579 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Ocera v. Solomon
110 A.D.2d 628 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
La Porta v. Fretto Enterprises, Inc.
100 A.D.2d 713 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Morris Electronics of Syracuse, Inc. v. Stereo East Developments, Inc.
71 A.D.2d 1062 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 A.D.2d 1061, 420 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-electronics-of-syracuse-inc-v-stereo-east-developments-inc-nyappdiv-1979.