Morgan v. Eads

805 N.E.2d 542, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1493
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 25, 2004
Docket2004-0141
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 805 N.E.2d 542 (Morgan v. Eads) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morgan v. Eads, 805 N.E.2d 542, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1493 (Ohio 2004).

Opinion

Certified Question of State Law from the United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, No. 1:99 CV 528. This cause came before the court on the certification of a state law question from the United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. On review of the preliminary memoranda pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII(6),

IT IS DETERMINED that the court will answer the following questions:

“1. Is an application to reopen an appeal under Ohio Rule of Appellate Procedure 26(B) part of the direct appeal from a judgment of conviction?

“2. If so, does the application become part of the direct appeal at the time of its filing or only upon the granting of the application?”

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the parties shall proceed to brief this case in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII(7).

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Bagley
Sixth Circuit, 2004
Willie Williams, Jr. v. Margaret Bagley, Warden
380 F.3d 932 (Sixth Circuit, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
805 N.E.2d 542, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morgan-v-eads-ohio-2004.