State v. Robinson

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Robinson

660 N.E.2d 472, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1518, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2499

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 2, 1996·No. 96-235·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Hamilton County, No. C-930949. Appellant has filed an untimely appeal of the court of appeals’ denial of appellant’s application to reopen pursuant to App.R. 26(B) and a motion for delayed appeal. This appeal involves a civil, post-conviction matter and not an appeal of a felony case to which the provisions for delayed appeal in S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(4) apply. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion for delayed appeal be, and hereby is, stricken.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that, in that appellant failed to perfect an appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. II(2)(A)(1), this case be, and hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton County, No. C-930949. Appellant has filed an untimely appeal of the court of appeals’ denial of appellant’s application to reopen pursuant to App.R. 26(B) and a motion for delayed appeal. This appeal involves a civil, post-conviction matter and not an appeal of a felony case to which the provisions for delayed appeal in S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(4) apply. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion for delayed appeal be, and hereby is, stricken.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that, in that appellant failed to perfect an appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. II(2)(A)(1), this case be, and hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

State v. Robinson, 660 N.E.2d 472, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1518, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 2499 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

660 N.E.2d 472 (State v. Robinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related