State v. Alexander

657 N.E.2d 511, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1470
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 1, 1995·No. 95-2406·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Muskingum County, Nos. 9134A and 9135A Appellant has filed an untimely notice of appeal and motion for delayed appeal with regard to Muskingum County Court of Appeals case Nos. CA9134 and CA9135, a discretionary appeal involving a felony and with regard to case Nos. 9134A and 9135A, an appeal filed pursuant to State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 584 N.E.2d 1204.

The appeal of case Nos. 9134A and 9135A involves a civil, post-conviction matter and not an appeal of a felony case to which the provisions for delayed appeal in S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(4) apply. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion for delayed appeal be, and hereby is, stricken as to case Nos. 9134A and 9135A

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that, in that appellant failed to perfect an appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(1), the appeal of case Nos. 9134A and 9135A be, and hereby [1471] is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Appellant’s appeal of case Nos. CA9134 and CA9135 remains pending.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Alexander, 657 N.E.2d 511, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1470 (Ohio 1995).

657 N.E.2d 511 (State v. Alexander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lester
2018 Ohio 5154 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2018)
Morgan v. Eads
104 Ohio St. 3d 142 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)