Moore v. U.S. Attorney General

951 F.2d 1200, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 30175
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedDecember 30, 1991
Docket91-3085
StatusPublished

This text of 951 F.2d 1200 (Moore v. U.S. Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. U.S. Attorney General, 951 F.2d 1200, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 30175 (10th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

951 F.2d 1200

Lee Alphonso MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL; J. Michael Quinlan, Director, Bureau
of Prisons; K.W. Hawk, Asst. Director, Central Office; Sam
Calborne, Asst. Regional Director, North Central Regional
Office; T. Lee Conner, Assoc. Warden, United States
Penitentiary Leavenworth, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-3085.

United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.

Dec. 30, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas; Richard D. Rogers, J. (D.C. No. 90-3136-R).

Lee Alphonso Moore, pro se.

Before McKAY, Chief Judge, SEYMOUR and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This matter is before the court on Appellant's motion to proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs or fees. We grant Appellant's motion and proceed to the merits of the case. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 82 S.Ct. 917, 8 L.Ed.2d 21 (1962); Ragan v. Cox, 305 F.2d 58 (10th Cir.1962).

Appellant challenges the district court's dismissal of his claim that Appellees have violated his constitutional rights by refusing to change his race classification in Bureau of Prison Records from "Black" to "African American." We AFFIRM the district court's disposition, found at 737 F.Supp. 1186 (D.Kan.1990), and hold that no constitutional issue has been raised.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
951 F.2d 1200, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 30175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-us-attorney-general-ca10-1991.