Moore v. United States

348 U.S. 966, 75 S. Ct. 530
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 28, 1955
DocketNo. 521
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 348 U.S. 966 (Moore v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moore v. United States, 348 U.S. 966, 75 S. Ct. 530 (1955).

Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The petition for certiorari is granted. Petitioner and witnesses tendered by him declined, because of religious scruples against oath-taking, to use the word “solemnly” in affirming to tell the truth. The trial court refused to permit them to testify. There is no requirement that the word “solemnly” be used in the affirmation, and the judgment of conviction is therefore reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griffin v. Harrington
915 F. Supp. 2d 1091 (C.D. California, 2012)
Scott v. State
80 S.W.3d 184 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
Bisby v. State
907 S.W.2d 949 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
United States v. Wallace Ward
989 F.2d 1015 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
State v. Spulak
720 S.W.2d 396 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1986)
George K. Gordon v. The State of Idaho
778 F.2d 1397 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
United States v. Robert Lee Looper
419 F.2d 1405 (Fourth Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
348 U.S. 966, 75 S. Ct. 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moore-v-united-states-scotus-1955.