Moore v. State
995 S.W.2d 524, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 934
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moore v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1425 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Lydell Moore, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing after he pled guilty to first degree robbery and armed criminal action.
We have reviewed the record on appeal and find the judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth our reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. State, 995 S.W.2d 524, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 934 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).
995 S.W.2d 524 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.