Moore v. State
43 S.W.3d 454, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 664, 2001 WL 378984
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moore v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 577 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. State, 43 S.W.3d 454, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 664, 2001 WL 378984 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).
43 S.W.3d 454 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.