Moore v. State
964 S.W.2d 464, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 249, 1998 WL 58860
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moore v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1425 →
Opinion
ORDER
Stanley Moore, Movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moore v. State, 964 S.W.2d 464, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 249, 1998 WL 58860 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).
964 S.W.2d 464 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.