Moore v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Moore v. State

897 S.W.2d 242, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 907, 1995 WL 297048

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moore v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1425 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 9, 1995·No. No. 66676·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial, without an evi-dentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Moore v. State, 897 S.W.2d 242, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 907, 1995 WL 297048 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

897 S.W.2d 242 (Moore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.