Moon v. State
This text of 572 S.W.2d 681 (Moon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION ON THE STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
The majority of the Court now adopts for its opinion the dissenting opinion on original submission. The “straw man” argument presented, the assumptions made, and the discussions concerning the voluntar-iness of the plea, in the opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, are wholly irrelevant. The record reflects that the appellant was carefully admonished concerning his guilty plea and that his constitutional rights were fully protected, but in view of the opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part a portion of the record will be incorporated in an appendix to this opinion. This portion of the record shows the appellant was fully and completely admonished and that he was accorded due process.
The State’s Motion for Rehearing is granted; the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
572 S.W.2d 681, 1978 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moon-v-state-texcrimapp-1978.