Montgomery v. Horneytown Fire Department

144 S.E.2d 586, 265 N.C. 553, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1042
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 3, 1965
Docket447
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 144 S.E.2d 586 (Montgomery v. Horneytown Fire Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montgomery v. Horneytown Fire Department, 144 S.E.2d 586, 265 N.C. 553, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1042 (N.C. 1965).

Opinion

Pee Cukiam.

G.S. 97-24 provides in pertinent part: “(a) The right to compensation under this article shall be forever barred unless a claim be filed with the Industrial Commission within two years after the accident, and if death results from the accident, unless a claim be filed with the Commission within one year thereafter.”

This Court has held the requirement that a claim be filed in accord with the provisions of the above statute constitutes “a condition precedent to the right to compensation, and is not a statute of limitations.” Lineberry v. Mebane, 218 N.C. 737, 12 S.E. 2d 252; Whitted v. Palmer-Bee Co., 228 N.C. 447, 46 S.E. 2d 109; Coats v. Wilson, Inc., 244 N.C. 76, 92 S.E. 2d 446.

The undisputed facts disclosed by the record support the conclusion of law reached by the hearing Commissioner, the full Commission and the court below. Hence, the judgment from which this appeal was taken is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McAuley v. N.C. A&T State Univ.
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2022
Cunningham v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2022
Gore v. Myrtle/Mueller
653 S.E.2d 400 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2007)
Gore v. Myrtle/Mueller
631 S.E.2d 892 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2006)
Tilly v. Sprinkler
546 S.E.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)
Burton v. Southern Ice Company, Inc.
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 1995
Reinhardt v. Women's Pavilion, Inc.
401 S.E.2d 138 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1991)
Parker v. Thompson-Arthur Paving Co.
396 S.E.2d 626 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1990)
Abels v. Renfro Corp.
394 S.E.2d 658 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1990)
Weston v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
309 S.E.2d 273 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1983)
Perdue v. Daniel International, Inc.
296 S.E.2d 845 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
Gantt v. Edmos Corp.
289 S.E.2d 75 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
Maine Bonding & Casualty Co. v. Mahoney
392 A.2d 16 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1978)
Barham v. Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co.
190 S.E.2d 306 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 S.E.2d 586, 265 N.C. 553, 1965 N.C. LEXIS 1042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montgomery-v-horneytown-fire-department-nc-1965.