MONTEJO INV. v. Green Companies, Inc.

471 So. 2d 158
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 11, 1985
Docket84-2584
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 471 So. 2d 158 (MONTEJO INV. v. Green Companies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MONTEJO INV. v. Green Companies, Inc., 471 So. 2d 158 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

471 So.2d 158 (1985)

MONTEJO INVESTMENTS, N.V., a Netherlands Antilles Corporation, Appellant,
v.
The GREEN COMPANIES, INC., OF FLORIDA, a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 84-2584.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 11, 1985.
Rehearing Denied July 10, 1985.

*159 Barnett, Alagia, Zamora & Suarez and Joseph J. Portuondo, Miami, for appellant.

Simon & Simon and Lauren L. Garner, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff filed an unsworn complaint alleging money due and owing for overpayment of security deposits on a lease agreement. In support of a motion for summary judgment, plaintiff attached an affidavit of its vice-president which stated:

1. That he is a Vice-President of THE GREEN COMPANIES, INC., the Plaintiff in this action.
2. Affiant is thoroughly familiar with the facts of this case and to the best of his knowledge and belief the facts alleged in the above motion are true and accurate.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT.
/s/ _______________________ GEORGE R. BROWN Vice-President of THE GREEN COMPANIES, INC.

This case is indistinguishable from Hurricane Boats, Inc. v. Certified Industrial Fabricators, Inc., 246 So.2d 174 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971) where we held that a similar affidavit failed to comply with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(e), which requires:

Supporting and opposing affidavits shall be made on personal knowledge, shall set forth such facts as would be admissible in evidence and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein.

The affidavit herein is defective in all three respects.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alvarez v. FLORIDA INS. GUAR. ASS'N, INC.
661 So. 2d 1230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Lenhal Realty, Inc. v. Transamerica Commercial Fin. Corp.
615 So. 2d 207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Kanecke v. George's Crane Service, Inc.
547 So. 2d 713 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
William S. Adler, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
542 So. 2d 1041 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Anderson v. SeaEscape Ltd., Inc.
541 So. 2d 1339 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
BRITISH AVIATION INS. CO. v. Menut
511 So. 2d 425 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Mathews v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB
507 So. 2d 1196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Nour v. All State Pipe Supply Co.
487 So. 2d 1204 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
471 So. 2d 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montejo-inv-v-green-companies-inc-fladistctapp-1985.