Mathews v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB
This text of 507 So. 2d 1196 (Mathews v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where, in an action to foreclose a mortgage, there remains a material issue of fact which cannot be settled due to a question as to the competency and authority of the movant’s affiant, see Montejo Investments, N.V. v. Green Co., 471 So.2d 158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), and the supporting affidavits did not disprove the affirmative defenses or establish the legal insufficiency of these defenses, O’Neal v. Brady, 476 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), it was error to enter summary judgment.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
507 So. 2d 1196, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1379, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathews-v-dime-savings-bank-of-new-york-fsb-fladistctapp-1987.