Mathews v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB

507 So. 2d 1196, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1379, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8546
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 2, 1987
DocketNo. 86-3016
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 507 So. 2d 1196 (Mathews v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mathews v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB, 507 So. 2d 1196, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1379, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8546 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Where, in an action to foreclose a mortgage, there remains a material issue of fact which cannot be settled due to a question as to the competency and authority of the movant’s affiant, see Montejo Investments, N.V. v. Green Co., 471 So.2d 158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), and the supporting affidavits did not disprove the affirmative defenses or establish the legal insufficiency of these defenses, O’Neal v. Brady, 476 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), it was error to enter summary judgment.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Newton v. Overseas Private Investment Corp.
544 So. 2d 224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Luna v. Total Mortgage, Ltd.
533 So. 2d 900 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
507 So. 2d 1196, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1379, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mathews-v-dime-savings-bank-of-new-york-fsb-fladistctapp-1987.