Luna v. Total Mortgage, Ltd.

533 So. 2d 900, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2503, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4967, 1988 WL 120872
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 15, 1988·No. No. 88-1719·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee has confessed error. Because appellee failed to refute appellant’s affirmative defenses or to establish their legal insufficiency, genuine issues of material fact remain unresolved. Consequently, the trial court erred in entering final summary judgment. See First Nat ’l Entertainment Corp. v. Brumlik, 531 So.2d 403 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Mathews v. Dime Sav. Bank of New York, 507 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Aroll v. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp., 496 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); O’Neal v. Brady, 476 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luna v. Total Mortgage, Ltd., 533 So. 2d 900, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2503, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4967, 1988 WL 120872 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

533 So. 2d 900 (Luna v. Total Mortgage, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aroll v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.
496 So. 2d 1011 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
First Nat. Entertainment Corp. v. Brumlik
531 So. 2d 403 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
O'NEAL v. Brady
476 So. 2d 294 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Mathews v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB
507 So. 2d 1196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)