Luna v. Total Mortgage, Ltd.

533 So. 2d 900, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2503, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4967, 1988 WL 120872
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 15, 1988
DocketNo. 88-1719
StatusPublished

This text of 533 So. 2d 900 (Luna v. Total Mortgage, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Luna v. Total Mortgage, Ltd., 533 So. 2d 900, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2503, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4967, 1988 WL 120872 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee has confessed error. Because appellee failed to refute appellant’s affirmative defenses or to establish their legal insufficiency, genuine issues of material fact remain unresolved. Consequently, the trial court erred in entering final summary judgment. See First Nat ’l Entertainment Corp. v. Brumlik, 531 So.2d 403 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Mathews v. Dime Sav. Bank of New York, 507 So.2d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Aroll v. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp., 496 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); O’Neal v. Brady, 476 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aroll v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.
496 So. 2d 1011 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
First Nat. Entertainment Corp. v. Brumlik
531 So. 2d 403 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
O'NEAL v. Brady
476 So. 2d 294 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Mathews v. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB
507 So. 2d 1196 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
533 So. 2d 900, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2503, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4967, 1988 WL 120872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/luna-v-total-mortgage-ltd-fladistctapp-1988.