Kanecke v. George's Crane Service, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kanecke v. George's Crane Service, Inc.

547 So. 2d 713, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4632, 1989 WL 90921

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 15, 1989

DocketNos. 88-2123, 88-2071

StatusPublished

This text of 547 So. 2d 713 (Kanecke v. George's Crane Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kanecke v. George's Crane Service, Inc., 547 So. 2d 713, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4632, 1989 WL 90921 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See First Mortgage Investors v. Boulevard Nat’l Bank, 327 So.2d 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); United Bonding Ins. Co. v. Dura-Stress, Inc., 243 So.2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(e); see also Carter v. Cessna Finance Corp., 498 So.2d 1319, 1321 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (“A factual basis for the affiant’s knowl[714]*714edge need not be set out where the affiant is shown to be in a position where he would necessarily possess the knowledge.”); cf. Montejo Inv., N.V. v. Green Cos., Inc., 471 So.2d 158, 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (corporate vice-president's affidavit concerning money due and owing for overpayment of security deposit defective where affiant states that “to the best of his knowledge and belief the facts alleged in the above motion are true and accurate” and does not set forth basis of his knowledge).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See First Mortgage Investors v. Boulevard Nat’l Bank, 327 So.2d 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); United Bonding Ins. Co. v. Dura-Stress, Inc., 243 So.2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(e); see also Carter v. Cessna Finance Corp., 498 So.2d 1319, 1321 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986) (“A factual basis for the affiant’s knowl[714]*714edge need not be set out where the affiant is shown to be in a position where he would necessarily possess the knowledge.”); cf. Montejo Inv., N.V. v. Green Cos., Inc., 471 So.2d 158, 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (corporate vice-president's affidavit concerning money due and owing for overpayment of security deposit defective where affiant states that “to the best of his knowledge and belief the facts alleged in the above motion are true and accurate” and does not set forth basis of his knowledge).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

547 So. 2d 713, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4632, 1989 WL 90921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kanecke-v-georges-crane-service-inc-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack