Monk v. Astrue
Opinion
Brenda K. Monk appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing Monk’s complaint pertaining to the denial of supplemental security income benefits for her daughter. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Monk v. Astrue, No. 4:06-cv-00075-jlk, 2007 WL 2693181 (WD.Va. Sept. 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
259 F. App'x 583 (Monk v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.