Monk v. Astrue

Fourth Circuit

Monk v. Astrue

239 F. App'x 818

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 5, 2007·No. No. 07-1662·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Brenda K: Monk appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to affirm the Commissioner’s decision to deny Monk’s claim for continued Supplemental Security Income benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Monk v. Astrue, No. 4:06-cv-00073-JLK, 2007 WL 1959173 (W.D.Va. July 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Brenda K: Monk appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to affirm the Commissioner’s decision to deny Monk’s claim for continued Supplemental Security Income benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Monk v. Astrue, No. 4:06-cv-00073-JLK, 2007 WL 1959173 (W.D.Va. July 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Monk v. Astrue, 239 F. App'x 818 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

239 F. App'x 818 (Monk v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.