Monk v. Astrue
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-1662
BRENDA K. MONK, V.A.M., Child,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cv-00073-JLK)
Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 5, 2007
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brenda K. Monk, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Bugbee Winn, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Brenda K. Monk appeals the district court’s order
accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to affirm the
Commissioner’s decision to deny Monk’s claim for continued
Supplemental Security Income benefits. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Monk v. Astrue, No. 4:06-cv-
00073-JLK (W.D. Va. July 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Monk v. Astrue (Monk v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.