Monk v. Astrue

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 5, 2007·No. 07-1662·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1662

BRENDA K. MONK, V.A.M., Child,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cv-00073-JLK)

Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 5, 2007

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brenda K. Monk, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Bugbee Winn, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Brenda K. Monk appeals the district court’s order

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to affirm the

Commissioner’s decision to deny Monk’s claim for continued

Supplemental Security Income benefits. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Monk v. Astrue, No. 4:06-cv-

00073-JLK (W.D. Va. July 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monk v. Astrue, (4th Cir. 2007).

Monk v. Astrue (Monk v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.