Moncion v. Stephen Sondheim Theater

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided June 6, 2022·No. 1:22-cv-01025·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BETTY M. MONCION, Plaintiff, 22-CV-1025 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL STEPHEN SONDHEIM THEATER, Defendant. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated March 25, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within sixty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. On April 6, 2022, the order was returned to the Court with a notation on the envelope indicating that the mail was undeliverable to that address. Plaintiff has not complied with the Court’s order, has failed to notify the Court of a change of mailing address, and has not initiated any further contact with the Court, written or otherwise. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: June 6, 2022 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moncion v. Stephen Sondheim Theater, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Moncion v. Stephen Sondheim Theater (Moncion v. Stephen Sondheim Theater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)