Molly v. State
This text of 490 So. 2d 1071 (Molly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find no error in the trial court’s modification of appellant’s probation. Williams v. State, 475 So.2d 272 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Watkins v. State, 368 So.2d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). The order modifying probation erroneously lists conspiracy to possess morphine as one of the grounds for modification. The trial court did not rely upon this reason and it should be stricken from the order. May v. State, 472 So.2d 890 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). We affirm the order as amended.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
490 So. 2d 1071, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1513, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/molly-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.