Evans v. State

488 So. 2d 636, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1128, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7773
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 14, 1986
DocketNo. 85-1434
StatusPublished

This text of 488 So. 2d 636 (Evans v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Evans v. State, 488 So. 2d 636, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1128, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7773 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of the appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. We do so out of deference to the trial court’s fact-finding authority on the disputed issues of fact tried at the hearing. There is competent, substantial evidence in the record to support the trial court’s conclusion that appellant’s trial counsel was not ineffective. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

HERSEY, C.J., ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
488 So. 2d 636, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1128, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evans-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.