Evans v. State
488 So. 2d 636, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1128, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7773
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Evans v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 452 So. 2d 1040 →
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of the appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. We do so out of deference to the trial court’s fact-finding authority on the disputed issues of fact tried at the hearing. There is competent, substantial evidence in the record to support the trial court’s conclusion that appellant’s trial counsel was not ineffective. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Evans v. State, 488 So. 2d 636, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1128, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7773 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
488 So. 2d 636 (Evans v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)