May v. State
This text of 472 So. 2d 890 (May v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Timothy Shane MAY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Anthony Calvello, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joan Fowler Rossin, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The record reveals that the trial court revoked the defendant's probation because he failed to file monthly reports for May, June, July and August, 1984. This finding alone will justify a revocation of probation. See Miller v. State, 444 So.2d 523 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Aaron v. State, 400 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 408 So.2d 1095 (Fla. 1981); Chappell v. State, 429 So.2d 84 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Jess v. State, 384 So.2d 328 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Page v. State, 363 So.2d 621 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978).
Although the record indicates that the foregoing was the sole basis for revoking the defendant's probation, the written order of revocation lists four additional grounds. Since these were not relied upon by the trial court, we strike them from the order of revocation. See Sparks v. State, 453 So.2d 539 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). And, as amended, we affirm.
Affirmed.
HURLEY and BARKETT, JJ., and WESSEL, JOHN D., Associate Judge, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
472 So. 2d 890, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/may-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.