Moffett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Moffett v. State

613 So. 2d 147, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2177, 1993 WL 39621

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 18, 1993

DocketNo. 91-3902

StatusPublished

This text of 613 So. 2d 147 (Moffett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moffett v. State, 613 So. 2d 147, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2177, 1993 WL 39621 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges his habitual offender sentence, arguing that the court failed to make the requisite findings under section 775.084, Florida Statutes. Because the appellant expressly agreed to be sentenced as a habitual offender, the necessity of specific findings under the statute was waived. See Cato v. State, 611 So.2d 22 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Robinson v. State, 605 So.2d 500 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The challenged sentenced is therefore affirmed.

ZEHMER, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges his habitual offender sentence, arguing that the court failed to make the requisite findings under section 775.084, Florida Statutes. Because the appellant expressly agreed to be sentenced as a habitual offender, the necessity of specific findings under the statute was waived. See Cato v. State, 611 So.2d 22 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Robinson v. State, 605 So.2d 500 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The challenged sentenced is therefore affirmed.

ZEHMER, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

613 So. 2d 147, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2177, 1993 WL 39621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moffett-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack