Moffett v. State
613 So. 2d 147, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2177, 1993 WL 39621
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moffett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5343 →
Opinion
The appellant challenges his habitual offender sentence, arguing that the court failed to make the requisite findings under section 775.084, Florida Statutes. Because the appellant expressly agreed to be sentenced as a habitual offender, the necessity of specific findings under the statute was waived. See Cato v. State, 611 So.2d 22 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Robinson v. State, 605 So.2d 500 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The challenged sentenced is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moffett v. State, 613 So. 2d 147, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2177, 1993 WL 39621 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
613 So. 2d 147 (Moffett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robinson v. State
605 So. 2d 500 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Cato v. State
611 So. 2d 22 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)