Moffett v. State

655 So. 2d 1304, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 16318, 1995 WL 348301
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 1995·No. No. 94-3030·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mark Moffett appeals his judgment and sentence for dealing in stolen property. We affirm the judgment and sentence except for the $50 the lower court imposed pursuant to section 960.20, Florida Statutes (Crimes Compensation Trust Fund). The cost imposed pursuant to section 960.20, Florida Statutes was increased in 1992 from $20 to $50. Ch. 92-107, § 13, at 905, Laws of Fla. The effective date of the amendment was July 1, 1992. Id. § 17, at 906. The act also provides that “[cjlaims for compensation arising from crimes that occurred before July 1, 1992, shall be governed by the law in effect on June 30, 1992.” Id. § 16, at 906. Mof-fett’s crime occurred in 1990. Therefore, the lower court should amend the judgment and sentence so that the cost imposed on Moffett pursuant to section 960.20, Florida Statutes is $20.

[1305]*1305AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ERVIN, MINER and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moffett v. State, 655 So. 2d 1304, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 16318, 1995 WL 348301 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

655 So. 2d 1304 (Moffett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1996