MLB v. State

673 So. 2d 582, 1996 WL 273688
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 24, 1996
Docket95-2017
StatusPublished

This text of 673 So. 2d 582 (MLB v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MLB v. State, 673 So. 2d 582, 1996 WL 273688 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

673 So.2d 582 (1996)

M.L.B., A Child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 95-2017.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 24, 1996.

*583 James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and E. Paul Stanley, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

M.L.B., a juvenile, appeals his adjudications and dispositions for the offenses of simple battery and violation of community control. We affirm his adjudications, vacate his dispositions, and remand for resentencing.

M.L.B. first contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal on the battery charge. This contention is without merit. The record contains sufficient evidence that the defendant committed a simple battery when he engaged in a fist fight on the school bus.

Next, M.L.B. maintains that his disposition order must be vacated, and the matter remanded for resentencing because the order fails to set forth the maximum period of state supervision. The problem, however, is that the trial court entered one disposition order addressing both the battery charge and the violation of community control. The law is clear that separate disposition orders must be entered for each offense adjudicated. D.D.M. v. State, 662 So.2d 384 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); T.A.R. v. State, 640 So.2d 222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Remand for correction is therefore required.

ADJUDICATIONS AFFIRMED; DISPOSITIONS VACATED; and MATTER REMANDED.

PETERSON, C.J., and COBB and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

T.A.R. v. State
640 So. 2d 222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
D.D.M. v. State
662 So. 2d 384 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
M.L.B. v. State
673 So. 2d 582 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
673 So. 2d 582, 1996 WL 273688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mlb-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.