A.D. v. State
This text of 720 So. 2d 318 (A.D. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s adjudication of guilt for grand theft of an automobile and use or possession of drug paraphernalia. However, appellant contends, and the State concedes, [319]*319that the trial court erred when it entered a single disposition order covering both offenses. “The law is clear that separate disposition orders must be entered for each offense adjudicated.” M.L.B. v. State, 673 So.2d 582, 583 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). Accordingly, we remand with directions to the trial court to enter separate disposition orders for each offense.
AFFIRMED, but REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
720 So. 2d 318, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14720, 1998 WL 796636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ad-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.