A.D. v. State

720 So. 2d 318, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14720, 1998 WL 796636
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 18, 1998
DocketNo. 98-0072
StatusPublished

This text of 720 So. 2d 318 (A.D. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
A.D. v. State, 720 So. 2d 318, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14720, 1998 WL 796636 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s adjudication of guilt for grand theft of an automobile and use or possession of drug paraphernalia. However, appellant contends, and the State concedes, [319]*319that the trial court erred when it entered a single disposition order covering both offenses. “The law is clear that separate disposition orders must be entered for each offense adjudicated.” M.L.B. v. State, 673 So.2d 582, 583 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). Accordingly, we remand with directions to the trial court to enter separate disposition orders for each offense.

AFFIRMED, but REMANDED.

DELL, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

M.L.B. v. State
673 So. 2d 582 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
720 So. 2d 318, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 14720, 1998 WL 796636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ad-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.