Mkparu v. Ohio Heart Care, Inc.
This text of 2000 Ohio 89 (Mkparu v. Ohio Heart Care, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 1232.]
MKPARU, APPELLEE, v. OHIO HEART CARE, INC. ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Mkparu v. Ohio Heart Care, Inc., 2000-Ohio-89.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 99-2276—Submitted October 18, 2000 at the Fairfield County Session— Decided December 13, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Stark County, No. 1998CA00283. __________________ Black, McCuskey, Souers & Arbaugh and Thomas W. Connors, for appellee. Allen Schulman & Associates Co., L.P.A., Allen Schulman, Jr., and Christopher J. Van Blargan; Craig T. Conley, for appellants. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would not dismiss this case as improvidently allowed, since this case involves substantial legal issues, which should be addressed. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the judgment of the trial court. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2000 Ohio 89, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mkparu-v-ohio-heart-care-inc-ohio-2000.