Mkparu v. Ohio Heart Care, Inc.

2000 Ohio 89, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1232
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mkparu v. Ohio Heart Care, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 90 Ohio St. 3d 1232
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 12, 2000·No. 1999-2276·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 1232.]

MKPARU, APPELLEE, v. OHIO HEART CARE, INC. ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Mkparu v. Ohio Heart Care, Inc., 2000-Ohio-89.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 99-2276—Submitted October 18, 2000 at the Fairfield County Session— Decided December 13, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Stark County, No. 1998CA00283. __________________ Black, McCuskey, Souers & Arbaugh and Thomas W. Connors, for appellee. Allen Schulman & Associates Co., L.P.A., Allen Schulman, Jr., and Christopher J. Van Blargan; Craig T. Conley, for appellants. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would not dismiss this case as improvidently allowed, since this case involves substantial legal issues, which should be addressed. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and reinstate the judgment of the trial court. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mkparu v. Ohio Heart Care, Inc., 2000 Ohio 89, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1232 (Ohio 2000).

2000 Ohio 89 (Mkparu v. Ohio Heart Care, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mkparu v. Ohio Heart Care, Inc.
738 N.E.2d 796 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)