Mitchell v. Ingram
429 U.S. 861, 97 S. Ct. 163, 50 L. Ed. 2d 139, 1976 U.S. LEXIS 2907
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 4, 1976·No. No. 76-117·Published·Cited by 231 cases
Opinion
Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mitchell v. Ingram, 429 U.S. 861, 97 S. Ct. 163, 50 L. Ed. 2d 139, 1976 U.S. LEXIS 2907 (1976).
429 U.S. 861 (Mitchell v. Ingram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moser v. Bret Harte Union High School District
366 F. Supp. 2d 944 (E.D. California, 2005)
J & J Manufacturing, Inc. v. Logan
24 F. Supp. 2d 692 (E.D. Texas, 1998)
Mayhew v. Town of Sunnyvale
964 S.W.2d 922 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)
Terrebonne, Ltd. of California v. Murray
1 F. Supp. 2d 1050 (E.D. California, 1998)
Reidy v. Runyon
971 F. Supp. 760 (E.D. New York, 1997)
Coles v. Arizona Charlie's
973 F. Supp. 971 (D. Nevada, 1997)
Dieter v. Regents of University of Cal.
963 F. Supp. 908 (E.D. California, 1997)
Fritz v. Arthur D. Little, Inc.
944 F. Supp. 95 (D. Massachusetts, 1996)
Cook v. City of Columbia Heights
945 F. Supp. 183 (D. Minnesota, 1996)
Sports Design and Development, Inc. v. Schoneboom
871 F. Supp. 1158 (N.D. Iowa, 1995)
Minnesota Pet-Breeders, Inc. v. Schell & Kampeter, Inc.
843 F. Supp. 506 (D. Minnesota, 1993)
Brooks v. Farm Fresh, Inc.
759 F. Supp. 1185 (E.D. Virginia, 1991)
Ferrari S.P.A. Esercizio Fabriche Automibili E Corse v. Roberts
739 F. Supp. 1138 (E.D. Tennessee, 1990)
Mead Data Central, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. And Toyota Motor Corp.
875 F.2d 1026 (Second Circuit, 1989)
Plasticolor Molded Products v. Ford Motor Co.
713 F. Supp. 1329 (C.D. California, 1989)
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATLAS PAPER BOX COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
868 F.2d 1487 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)
Larkin v. Pullman-Standard Division, Pullman, Inc.
854 F.2d 1549 (Eleventh Circuit, 1988)
Powers v. Alabama Department of Education
854 F.2d 1285 (Eleventh Circuit, 1988)
Chuck Blore & Don Richman, Inc. v. 20/20 Advertising Inc.
674 F. Supp. 671 (D. Minnesota, 1987)
Stitz v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
650 F. Supp. 914 (D. Maryland, 1987)