Misko v. Capuder
173 So. 2d 210, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 4298
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Misko v. Capuder. Read the opinion of the Court — 1962 La. App. LEXIS 1447 →
Opinion
This is a companion suit to Capuder v. Misko, 173 So.2d 210. The motion to dismiss in this case is also based upon the absence of. a signed judgment. There is, therefore, no final judgment from which an appeal can be taken and the appeal must be dismissed in the absence of a signed judgment. LSA-C.C.P. Art. 1911; Fontenot v. Lee, 160 So.2d 26 (La.App. 3 Cir., 1964).
For the reasons assigned, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice, at the cost of appellant.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Misko v. Capuder, 173 So. 2d 210, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 4298 (La. Ct. App. 1965).
173 So. 2d 210 (Misko v. Capuder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fontenot v. Lee
160 So. 2d 26 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)
Capuder v. Misko
173 So. 2d 210 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1965)