Misko v. Capuder

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Misko v. Capuder

173 So. 2d 210, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 4298

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 31, 1965

DocketNo. 1447

StatusPublished

This text of 173 So. 2d 210 (Misko v. Capuder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Misko v. Capuder, 173 So. 2d 210, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 4298 (La. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion suit to Capuder v. Misko, 173 So.2d 210. The motion to dismiss in this case is also based upon the absence of. a signed judgment. There is, therefore, no final judgment from which an appeal can be taken and the appeal must be dismissed in the absence of a signed judgment. LSA-C.C.P. Art. 1911; Fontenot v. Lee, 160 So.2d 26 (La.App. 3 Cir., 1964).

For the reasons assigned, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice, at the cost of appellant.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion suit to Capuder v. Misko, 173 So.2d 210. The motion to dismiss in this case is also based upon the absence of. a signed judgment. There is, therefore, no final judgment from which an appeal can be taken and the appeal must be dismissed in the absence of a signed judgment. LSA-C.C.P. Art. 1911; Fontenot v. Lee, 160 So.2d 26 (La.App. 3 Cir., 1964).

For the reasons assigned, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice, at the cost of appellant.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 So. 2d 210, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 4298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/misko-v-capuder-lactapp-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack