Capuder v. Misko

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Capuder v. Misko

173 So. 2d 210, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 4297

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 31, 1965

DocketNo. 1446

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 173 So. 2d 210 (Capuder v. Misko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Capuder v. Misko, 173 So. 2d 210, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 4297 (La. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss filed in this case is based on the record which does not show that a judgment was signed by the lower court. There is, therefore, no final judgment from which an appeal can be taken and the court must dismiss the appeal in the absence of a signed judgment. LSA-C.C.P. Art. 1911; Fontenot v. Lee, 160 So.2d 26 (La.App. 3 Cir., 1964).

For the reasons assigned, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice, at the cost of appellant.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss filed in this case is based on the record which does not show that a judgment was signed by the lower court. There is, therefore, no final judgment from which an appeal can be taken and the court must dismiss the appeal in the absence of a signed judgment. LSA-C.C.P. Art. 1911; Fontenot v. Lee, 160 So.2d 26 (La.App. 3 Cir., 1964).

For the reasons assigned, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice, at the cost of appellant.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 So. 2d 210, 1965 La. App. LEXIS 4297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/capuder-v-misko-lactapp-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack